Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of comparative physiology
  3. Article

Detection of oscillating target movements by echolocation in the Greater Horseshoe bat

  • Published: September 1983
  • Volume 153, pages 385–391 (1983)
  • Cite this article

Access provided by Institution of Civil Engineers Library

Download PDF
View saved research
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Detection of oscillating target movements by echolocation in the Greater Horseshoe bat
Download PDF
  • Hans -Ulrich Schnitzler1 &
  • Erwin Flieger1 
  • 222 Accesses

  • 64 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Summary

The abilities of 11 Greater Horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) to discriminate an oscillating from a stationary target by evaluating Doppler shifts in the echoes were studied in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. At oscillation frequencies (f osc) from 5–30 Hz the best performing bat reached the threshold of 75% correct choices at approximately constant modulation depths of 60 Hz. Atf osc above 30 Hz the threshold modulation depths decreased with increasingf osc down to only 12 Hz at af osc of 200 Hz whereas the thresholds of the maximal sweep rate stayed constant at about 6 Hz/ms. The results demonstrate that Greater Horseshoe bats evaluate frequency modulations caused by oscillating target movements. They suggest the existence of two separate mechanisms for the detection of modulations forf osc between 5–30 Hz and forf osc above 30 Hz.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection

Article Open access 22 September 2022

Greater Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus nippon) gradually converge their echolocation call frequency to colony members

Article Open access 23 June 2026

Horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus nippon) suppress clutter noise through echolocation frequency control to detect prey

Article Open access 19 May 2026

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Auditory Perception
  • Ultrasonography
  • Electroacoustics
  • Oscillators
  • Motion Detection
  • Ultrasonics
  • Echolocation Mechanisms in Chiropteran Foraging Systems

References

  • Heilmann U (1982) Das Frequenzunterscheidungsvermögen der Groβen Hufeisennase,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. 56. Hauptvers Dtsch Ges Säugetierkd

  • Neuweiler G (1980) Auditory processing of echoes: peripheral processing. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 519–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak GD (1980) Organizational and encoding features of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of bats. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 549–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1968) Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1970a) Echoortung bei der FledermausChilonycteris rubiginosa. Z Vergl Physiol 68:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1970b) Comparison of the echolocation behavior inRhinolophus ferrumequinum andChilonycteris rubiginosa. Bijdr Dierkd 40:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1973) Control of Doppler shift compensation in the Greater Horseshoe Bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 82:79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1978) Die Detektion von Bewegungen durc0h Echoortung bei Feldermäusen. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 71:pp 16–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U, Henson OW Jr (1980) Performance of airborne animal sonar systems: I. Microchiroptera. In: Busnel RG, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 109–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U, Ostwald J (1983) Adaptations for the detection of fluttering insects by echolocating horseshoe bats. In: Ewert JP, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 801–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U, Menne D, Kober R, Heblich K (in press) The acoustical image of fluttering insects in echolocating bats. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology: Roots and growing points. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

  • Schuller G (1972) Echoortung beiRhinolophus ferrumequinum mit frequenzmodulierten Lauten. J Comp Physiol 77:306–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G, Beuter K, Schnitzler H-U (1974) Response to frequency shifted artificial echoes in the batRhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 89:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1974) Response of a Doppler echolocation system in the batRhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Acoust Soc Am 56:672–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappe M (1982) Verhalten und Echoortung der Grossen Hufeisennase beim Insektenfang. Dissertation, University of Tübingen, FRG

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappe M, Schnitzler H-U (1982) Doppler shift compensation in insect-catching horseshoe bats. Naturwissenschaften 69:193–194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl Zoophysiologie, Institut für Biologie III, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, D-7400, Tübingen, Germany

    Hans -Ulrich Schnitzler & Erwin Flieger

Authors
  1. Hans -Ulrich Schnitzler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erwin Flieger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnitzler, H.U., Flieger, E. Detection of oscillating target movements by echolocation in the Greater Horseshoe bat. J. Comp. Physiol. 153, 385–391 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612592

Download citation

  • Accepted: 20 June 1983

  • Issue date: September 1983

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612592

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Frequency Modulation
  • Oscillation Frequency
  • Doppler Shift
  • Stationary Target
  • Sweep Rate

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

172.71.28.190

ICE Institution of Civil Engineers (3000167333) - Institution of Civil Engineers Library (2000027800)

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature