User:Deepfriedokra
Created or improved at AfC.
Wikified, etc.
Barnstars.
|
|
DFO's rule of thumb
[edit]One promotional edit or article creation indicates a lack of understanding of our WP:SPAM polices. Two promotional edits or article creations indicate ignoring/not understanding spam warning. Three promotional edits or article creations indicate intentional use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. (And adding spam to multiple Wikipedias in a foreign language is way over the top.)
Useful
[edit]
|
Tools Boiler plate messages
|
More messages
|
<div class="user-block" style="background:Gainsboro; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">
Thanks for trying to help build Wikipedia, the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
- "All content must be summarized and [[WP:cite|cite]]d from [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:IS|unconnected]] with the subject and have a reputation for [[WP:V|fact checking]]."
- [[WP:BRD|Please discuss content and sourcing on article talk page and achieve consensus for any changes]] Please make [[WP:EDITREQUEST]]s on the article's talk page. Please seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] as needed.
- Please [[WP:BRD|discuss changes on article talk page.]]. Please make [[WP:EDITREQUEST]]s and/or seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] as needed.
- Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]]. Unlike LinkedIn, it does not have pages for companies. It has encyclopedia articles, of which some are about companies.
- [[Wikipedia:Purpose|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]]-- subjects of articles must meet [[WP:N|inclusion requirements]] with information summarized and cited from [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which are [[WP:IS|unconnected with the subject]] and which provide [[WP:V|verifiable information]]. '''Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.'''
- " All content must be summarized and [[WP:cite|cite]]d from [[WP:reliable sources|reliable]], [[WP:IS|independent]] sources with a reputation for [[WP:V|fact checking]]."
- It is unlikely that you will be able to write about [subject] non promotionally at first. "Experience has unfortunately shown that most (but not all) people with experience in PR cannot be taught to write a proper article, because they are so completely oriented to writing advertisements or quasi-advertisements that they honestly cannot see the difference between that and a proper encyclopedia article." -- [[User:DGG]]. You will need therefore to describe what constructive edits you would make to help build the wonder of the world that is Wikipedia.
- "Startups," as 331dot says, almost never merit articles; a company must typically become established and recognized in its field in order to draw the significant coverage needed to merit that company an article according to our guidelines. The vast majority of companies on this planet do not merit articles. Wikipedia is not a place for a company to tell about itself and its offerings; our articles summarize what independent reliable sources say about a topic. Staff interviews, press releases, other company materials, brief mentions, and the reporting of routine business activities(like the raising of capital or commencement of operations) do not establish notability.
Gallery
[edit]- On the internet, no one knows I'm really a dog.
- However, I am not a little black dog.
- dog earred
- power pole
- bamboo stand
- The ANI tree
- red bottlebrush suspended from a plant
- treeflections
- purple flower macro
- dog nose I try
- green leaf
Clarity
[edit]There is life after Wikipedia.
There is life beyond Wikipedia
There is happiness after Wikipedia.
There is happiness beyond Wikipedia
There is joy after Wikipedia.
There is joy beyond Wikipedia
There is freedom after Wikipedia
There is freedom beyond Wikipedia.
Shantih, shantih, shantih