
ããŸãšããåãé€ããŸãð¥ããThe relative effectiveness of sterilized and non sterilized foreign exchange market interventionsãè«æèŠçŽæçš¿ No.1âš2023/10/16
åæ¥è«æãçå®ã«é²ãããð
ç§ãããããåæ¥è«æã®å·çã«
åããããææããã£ãŠåããŸããð
äœäºãã¢ãŠããããåæã®ã€ã³ãããã
倧äºã§ãããšãnoteã§æ¯æ¥çºä¿¡ããŠããŸãã
ããã¯ãã©ã®ãããªå
容ã§
ãã£ãŠãåœãŠã¯ãŸããŸãð
è«æãäžæŠã«èªãã§ã
èšæ¶ã«æ®ã£ãŠããªãã£ãã
倧åãªèгç¹ãå¿ããŠããŸã£ãŠãããããã
åæ¥è«æã®é²æã¯æ»ã£ãŠããŸããšæããŸã
ã ããããããã®ãnoteãããã«æŽ»çšããŠ
åæ¥è«æã1ïŒ
ã§ã
宿ã«åããŠé²ããŠãããããšæããŸã
åçåãããããšã¯ãªããå
è¡ç ç©¶ãªã©ã®ã³ã³ãã³ããæ£ããåŒçšããé©åãªçºä¿¡ãã§ããããã«åªããŸãð
ç§ã®åè«å·çãžã®è»è·¡ã
ã©ããæåŸãŸã§ãæèªãã ããð
ä»åã®èŠçŽããå è¡ç ç©¶ð¥
ä»åãèªã¿é²ããŠããè«æã¯
ãã¡ãã«ãªããŸãð
The relative effectiveness of sterilized and non sterilized foreign exchange market interventions
Keith Pilbeamâ
Department of Economics, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK Available online 19 January 2005
The relative effectiveness of sterilized and non sterilized foreign exchange market interventions
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of non sterilized and sterilized foreign exchange market operations on both the exchange rate and domestic interest rate within the context of a rational expectations portfolio balance model.
The results show that non sterilized intervention will be more effective than sterilized intervention in affecting both the exchange rate and domestic interest rate.
Both types of operations affect a market risk premium that is shown to be a function of relative asset supplies in the hands of the private sector.
When domestic and foreign bonds are perfect substitutes, the risk premium vanishes and so to does the effectiveness of sterilized foreign exchange market interventions.
Keywords: Exchange market intervention; Sterilized intervention; Non sterilized intervention
èŠçŽïŒAbstract
ãã®è«æã¯ãåççãªæåŸ
ã«åºã¥ããŠãçºæ¿ã¬ãŒããšåœå
éå©ã®äž¡æ¹ã«ã€ããŠããŒããã©ãªãªãã©ã³ã¹ã¢ãã«ã®ããšã§éäžèåããã³äžèåãããå€åœçºæ¿åžå Žæäœ(the impact of non sterilized and sterilized foreign exchange market operations)ã®åœ±é¿ã調æ»ããŸã
çµæã¯ãäžèåãããªãä»å
¥(non sterilized intervention)ã¯ãäžèåãããä»å
¥ããã广çã§ããããšã瀺ããŠããŸã
ã©ã¡ãã®ã¿ã€ãã®ãªãã¬ãŒã·ã§ã³ããæ°ééšéã®çžå¯Ÿçãªè³ç£äŸçµŠã®é¢æ°ã§ããããšã瀺ãããŠããåžå Žãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã«åœ±é¿ãäžããŸã
ãã ããåœå
åµåžãšå€åœåµåžãå®å
šãªä»£æ¿åã«ãªããšããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã¯æ¶æ»
ããäžèåãããå€åœçºæ¿åžå Žä»å
¥ã®æå¹æ§ãæ¶æ»
ããŸã
ããŒã¯ãŒã: çºæ¿åžå Žä»å
¥(Exchange market intervention)ãäžèåä»å
¥(Sterilized intervention)ãéäžèåçä»å
¥(Non sterilized intervention)
Conclusions
This paper has investigated the relative effectiveness of non sterilized and sterilized interventions in the foreign exchange market.
A non sterilized foreign exchange operation does not require a risk premium to have an effect on both the exchange rate and the domestic interest rate while a sterilized intervention exerts its effects by altering the risk premium.
The portfolio balance model breaks up the uncovered interest rate parity condition by the introduction of a risk premium.
We have derived from the model structure itself an equation for the change in the risk premium.
The change in the risk premium is affected by changes in all the asset supplies depicted in the model including the domestic money supply, this suggests that existing research which typically analyses the risk premium in relation to only two assets, domestic and foreign bonds, needs to be extended to explicitly include changes in the money stock.
It is clear that one cannot analyse the effectiveness of exchange market intervention without analysing the risk premium.
How large a SFXO may be required to exert a significant exchange rate effect is basically an empirical question, see, for example, Fatum and Hutchison (2003).
If it is the case that it requires a very large scale operation to have significant exchange rate effects the reserve changes implied may act as a constraint on the usage of this policy instrument or by adversely affecting private expectations even be counterproductive.
ãã®è«æã¯ãå€åœçºæ¿åžå Žã«ãããéäžèåä»å
¥ãšäžèåä»å
¥ã®çžå¯Ÿçãªæå¹æ§ã調æ»ããŸãã
äžèåãããŠããªãå€åœçºæ¿æäœã§ã¯ãçºæ¿ã¬ãŒããšåœå
éå©ã®äž¡æ¹ã«åœ±é¿ãäžããããã®ãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã¯å¿
èŠãããŸããããäžèåãããä»å
¥ã¯ãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã倿Žããããšã«ãã£ãŠãã®å¹æãçºæ®ããŸã
ããŒããã©ãªãªãã©ã³ã¹ã¢ãã«ã¯ããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã®å°å
¥ã«ããç¶æ³ããããšã§ã«ããŒãããŠããªãéå©å¹³äŸ¡(the uncovered interest rate parity condition)ãåå²ããŸã
ãããŠãã¢ãã«æ§é ãã®ãã®ããããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã®å€åã®æ¹çšåŒãå°ãåºããŸãã
ãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã®å€åã¯ãåœå
ãããŒãµãã©ã€ãå«ããã¢ãã«ã«ç€ºãããŠãããã¹ãŠã®è³ç£äŸçµŠã®å€åã«ãã£ãŠåœ±é¿ãåããŸã
ããã¯ãéåžžãåœå
åµåžãšå€åœåµåžã® 2 ã€ã®è³ç£ã®ã¿ã«é¢é£ããŠãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ãåæããæ¢åã®ç ç©¶ã§ã¯ã以äžã®ããšãå¿
èŠã§ããããšã瀺åããŠããŸã
ãããŒã¹ããã¯ã®å€åãæç€ºçã«å«ãããã«æ¡åŒµãããã¹ãã§ã
ãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ãåæããã«çºæ¿åžå Žä»å
¥ã®æå¹æ§ãåæã§ããªãããšã¯æããã§ã
é倧ãªçºæ¿ã¬ãŒã广ãçºæ®ããããã«ã©ã®ãããã®èŠæš¡ã® SFXO(sterilized foreign exchange operation)ãå¿
èŠãã¯ãåºæ¬çã«ã¯çµéšçãªåé¡ã§ã
ããšãã°ãFatum and Hutchison (2003)ãåç
§ããŠãã ãã
çºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã«å€§ããªåœ±é¿ãäžããããã«éåžžã«å€§èŠæš¡ãªæäœãå¿
èŠãªå Žåãæºåéã®å€æŽãæå³ãããã®ã¯ããã®æ¿çææ®µã®å©çšã«å¯Ÿããå¶çŽãšããŠæ©èœããããæ°éã®æåŸ
(private expectations)ã«æªåœ±é¿ãåãŒããé广ã«ãªãå¯èœæ§ãããããŸã
å€åœçºæ¿åžå Žã®åœ±é¿ã調æ»ããå€ãã®æç®ð
äžå€®éè¡ã«ããä»å
¥ã«ã€ããŠã¯ãäŸãã°ãAdams and Henderson (1983)ãArgy (1982)ã Fatum and Hutchison (2003)ãGenberg (1981)ãKenen (1982ã1987) ããã³åªããèª¿æ» Taylor and Sarno(2001)ãªã©ããããŸã
ãã®æç®ã¯äž»ã«ä»å
¥ã®çºæ¿ã¬ãŒããžã®åœ±é¿(the exchange rate effects of intervention)ã«çŠç¹ãåœãŠãåŸåããããŸã
ãã ããä»å
¥ã«ããéå©å¹æã«çŠç¹ãåœãŠãããšãåæ§ã«éèŠã§ã
ã²ããŠã¯ãä»å
¥ã«ããå€åœçºæ¿åžå Žã®åœå
çµæžãžã®åœ±é¿ã¯ããã2ã€ã®å¹æã®çµã¿åããã§ã
çºæ¿ã¬ãŒããšéå©ã®äž¡æ¹ãã©ã®ããã«åœ±é¿ãããã瀺ãããŒããã©ãªãªãã©ã³ã¹ã¢ãã«å¹æã¯ãè³ç£ã¯æ°ééšéã®çžå¯Ÿè³ç£ã®é¢æ°ã§ãããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ãžã®åœ±é¿ã«é¢é£ããŠããŸã
ãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã«å¯Ÿããçºæ¿åžå Žä»å
¥ã®åæã¯ãDooley and Isard (1983)ã«ãã£ãŠè¡ãããããã§ã¯éçãªæåŸ
ã¢ãã«(a static expectations model)ã䜿çšãããŸãã
Analyzing the effects on the risk premiumð
ã¢ãã«ã«ã€ããŠã¯ããªã³ã¯ããå
è¡ç ç©¶ãã確èªãã ããïŒ
ãªãã以äžã«çºæ¿ã¬ãŒã(S)ã«äžããäžèåä»å
¥ãªãã³ã«éäžèåä»å
¥æäœã®å¹æ(Fig. 1. The effects of sterilized and non sterilized foreign exchange operations)ã«ã€ããŠã解説ãããå³ãæç€ºããŠãããŸã

ãããŠãæåŸã®èŠç¹æŽçãšããŠããŒããã©ãªãªãªãã©ã³ã¹ã¢ãã«ã«ããããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ãžã®åœ±é¿ããŸãšããããšã«ããŸããã
äžèåä»å
¥ãšéäžèåä»å
¥ãšãã2ã€ã®æäœããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã«ãããã圱é¿ã®çµæã衚1ã«ãŸãšããŸã

ããããããšã§ããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã«å¯Ÿããçºæ¿ä»å
¥æäœã®çŽæ¥çãªåœ±é¿ãšéæ¥çãªåœ±é¿ãšã®éã®é¢ä¿ãåºå¥ãããããšã«ãªããŸã
ä»å
¥ããããããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ãžã®çŽæ¥çãªå¹æ(The direct effect)ã¯çžå¯Ÿçãªè³ç£äŸçµŠã®å€åããçãã鿥广(the indirect effect)ã¯çžå¯Ÿçãªè³ç£äŸçµŠã®å€åã«ãã£ãŠåŒãèµ·ããããçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®å€åã®çµæãšããŠçããããšã«ãªããŸã
ãããŠãäž¡æ¹ã«ãããŠåœå
éå©ã®å€åãšäºæ³ãããèªåœéè²šã®æžäŸ¡(expected depreciation of the currency)ã¯çŽæ¥å¹æãšéæ¥å¹æã«åããããŸã
衚1ã«å ±åãããŠããçµæã«ã€ããŠã¯èª¬æãå¿
èŠã§ã
FXOïŒéäžèåä»å
¥ïŒã®å Žåã ãããŒãµãã©ã€ã®å¢å ã®çŽæ¥çãªåœ±é¿ã¯ãåœå
éå©ãäœäžãããããšã«ãªããŸã
ãã ããSFXOïŒäžèåä»å
¥ïŒã®å ŽåãçŽæ¥çãªå¹æã¯åœå
éå©ã®äžæ(the direct effect is to raise the domestic interest rate)ã§ã
ãªããªãããã®äžèåä»å
¥ãªãã¬ãŒã·ã§ã³ã«ãããæ°éãšãŒãžã§ã³ãã«ããåœå
åµåžã®ä¿æé¡ãä»ã®2ã€ã®è³ç£ãšæ¯ã¹ãŠçžå¯Ÿçã«å¢å ããããã§ã
ãã ããã©ã¡ãã®å Žåã§ããåœå
éå©ãžã®éæ¥çãªåœ±é¿ã¯æ¬¡ã®ãšããã§ã
èªåœéè²šã®æžäŸ¡ã«ããæ°ééšé(private agents)ã®è³ç£ãå¢å ãã åœå
åµåžã®å Žåã«ã¯ãã®éèŠãå¢å ããããäŸ¡æ Œãäžæããããšããåœå
éå©ã«ã¯ãã€ãã¹ã®åœ±é¿ããããŸã
çºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®åœ±é¿ã«ã€ããŠã¯ãä»å
¥æäœã®çŽæ¥çãªåœ±é¿ã¯ã ãªãã¬ãŒã·ã§ã³ã«ããåœå
è³ç£ã®çžå¯Ÿçãªä¿æãå¢å ãããããäºæ³ãããé貚ã®å¢äŸ¡(expected appreciation)ã«ãªããŸã
ãã ããåæã®èªåœé貚æžã«ããã鿥çãªå¹æã¯æ¬¡ã®ããã«äœçšããŸã
èªåœéè²šã®æžäŸ¡ã¯ãèªåœè³ç£ã«å¯ŸããŠäºæ³ãããèªåœéè²šã®æžäŸ¡ãå¿
èŠãšããæµ·å€è³ç£ã®çžå¯Ÿçãªä¿æãå¢å ããã广ããããããéæ¹å(opposite direction)ã«ãªããŸã
 ãã ããçµæžãç¬èªã®å®å®ããåè¡¡æé·çµè·¯(stable saddle path)ã«ä¹ã£ãå Žåãåè
ã®å¹æïŒæžäŸ¡ïŒã¯æžå°ããåŸè
ïŒå¢äŸ¡ïŒãäžåã£ãŠãããããåœå
é貚ã®å¢äŸ¡ãäºæ³ãããããšãç§ãã¡ã¯ç¥ã£ãŠããŸã
ã芧ã®ãšãããããŸããŸãªãã©ã¡ãŒã¿ã«å¶çŽã課ããªãéããããŸããŸãªæ¥åã®ãªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã«å¯Ÿããæ£å³ã®åœ±é¿ãè©äŸ¡ããããšã¯äžå¯èœã§ã
ãã®ãããªãããŸãã(ambiguity)ã®åå ã¯ãäœããã®æäœåŸã«èªåœéè²šã®æžäŸ¡ãåŒãèµ·ãããããšããäºå®ã«ç±æ¥ããŸã
æ°éä¿æã®å€åœåµåžãåè©äŸ¡ããããã«ãã£ãŠåœå
ã®å¯ãå¢ãããå€åœåµåžãæ®ããšãã£ãåœå
åµåžãšè²šå¹£ã®åšåº«ã®æ¯çãäžãããäžãããã¯äžæã§ãããšããããšã§ã
ã€ãŸãããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã瀺ã颿°ã¯ä»¥äžã®ããã«ç€ºãããããšã«ãªããŸã
FXOïŒéäžèåä»å
¥ïŒã§ã¯ãB/W æ¯ãäœäžããäžæ¹ã§ãM/Wæ¯ãäžæãããäœäžãããã¯äžæçã§ã
äžæ¹ãSFXOïŒäžèåä»å
¥ïŒã®å ŽåãM/Wãæ¯çãäžããäžæ¹ã§ B/W æ¯ãå¢å ãããæžå°ãããã¯äžæã§ã
ç·ããŠãFXOïŒéäžèåä»å
¥ïŒãšSFXOïŒäžèåä»å
¥ïŒã®éãã¯ããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ãžã®åœ±é¿ããããã®éãã«å€§ããäŸåããŸã
ãããŠãSFXOïŒäžèåä»å
¥æäœïŒãçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã«äœããã®å¹æãçºæ®ããã«ã¯ããªã¹ã¯ãã¬ãã¢ã ã®ååšãäžå¯æ¬ ãšèšããã®ã§ã
æ¬æ¥ã®è§£èª¬ã¯ãããŸã§ãšããããŸã
次åã®è«æèŠçŽæçš¿ãä¹ããæåŸ
ããã ããŸããšå¹žãã§ã
èªã¿çµããå è¡ç ç©¶ð
ãæ¥æ¬ã®çºæ¿ä»å
¥ã®åæã
äŒè€éæã»è
çµæžç ç©¶ãVol.54 No.2 Apr. 2003
ãEffects of the Bank of Japanâs intervention on yen/dollar exchange rate volatilityã21 November 2004
Toshiaki Watanabe (a), Kimie Harada (b)
ãThe Effects of Japanese Foreign Exchange Intervention: GARCH Estimation and Change Point Detectionã
Eric Hillebrand Gunther Schnabl Discussion
Paper No.6 October 2003
Author/Editor:Jaromir Benes ; Andrew Berg ; Rafael A Portillo ; David Vávra
Publication Date: January 14, 2013
Official Japanese Intervention in the JPY/USD Exchange Rate Market: Is It Effective and Through Which Channel Does It Work?
Rasmus Fatum*
IMES Discussion Paper Series
2009-E-12 March 2009
ç§ã®ç ç©¶ããŒãã«ã€ããŠð
ç§ã¯ãçºæ¿ä»å
¥ã®å®èšŒåæããããŒãã«
åæ¥è«æãå·çããããšèããŠããŸãð
æ¥æ¬çµæžãèãããšãã«ãçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã«ãã£ãŠ
貿æååŒãçµåžžåæ¯ãå€åããã
æ ªã蚌åžã嵿š©ãšãã£ãéèè³ç£ã®åççã
å€åããããšæ¥æ¬çµæžãšçºæ¿ã¬ãŒããšã¯
åã£ãŠãåããªãçžãããã®ã§ãð
ïŒåðŽã ãã«ïœ¥ïœ¥ïœ¥ïŒ
çµæžã·ã§ãã¯ã«ãã£ãŠ
çºæ¿ã¬ãŒããå€åãããš
ãã®åœ±é¿ã¯ç§ãã¡ã®ç掻ã«å€§ãã圱é¿ããŸã
ã ãããããçºæ¿ã¬ãŒãã®å®å®æ§ã
æ
ä¿ãããããªçºæ¿ä»å
¥ã¯ãã¯ãçµæžæ¿çã«
ãããŠãéåžžã«éèŠãªæçŸ©ãæã£ãŠãããš
æšæž¬ããŠããŸã
決ããŠåŠéšçãæ¥œããŠå·çã§ãã
ç°¡åãªããŒããéžæããŠããããã§ã¯ç¡ããšä¿¡ããŠããŸã
ãã ããã®åæ¥è«æãããåãããšã
ç§ã®åŠççæŽ»ã®é倧æãšãªãããšã¯äºå®ãªã®ã§
æåŸãŸã§ã³ãã³ããšåãçµãã§åããŸãð¥
æ¬æ¥ã®è§£èª¬ã¯ã以äžãšããŸãð
ä»åŸãçµæžåŠçè«éãªãã³ã«
瀟äŒèª²é¡ã«å¯ŸããçµæžåŠçèŠç¹ã«ãã説æãªã©
ææçŸ©ãªå
容ãçºä¿¡ã§ããããã«
åªããŠãŸãããŸãã®ã§
ä»åŸãšãå®ãããé¡ãããŸãð¥º
ãã¬ãžã³ã®ã玹ä»ð
ãã¡ãã®ãã¬ãžã³ã«ãŠ
åæ¥è«æå·çãžã®è»è·¡
ãšãã»ã³ã·ã£ã«çµæžåŠçè«éããªãã³ã«
ãåœéçµæžåŠðãã®åºç€çè«ããŸãšããŠããŸã
ä»åŸãããã«ã³ã³ãã³ããæ¡å
ã§ããããã«åªããŠåããŸãã®ã§äœåãããããé¡ãç³ãäžããŸãð
æåŸãŸã§ãæèªããã ãèª ã«æé£ãããããŸããïŒ
ãããŸã§ãç§ã®èŠè§£ãæã£ãããšã
ãŸãšããããŠããã ããŠãŸãã
ãã®ç¹ã«é¢ããŸããŠããäºæ¿ãã ããð
ãã®æçš¿ãã¿ãŠãã ãã£ãæ¹ã
ã»ãã®å°ããªäºã§ãåŠã³ããã£ãïŒ
èãæ¹ã®åŒãåºããå¢ããïŒ
èªæžããåŠã¹ãããšãå€ãïŒ
ãªã©ãªã©ããã©ã¹ã®åç©«ããã£ãã®ã§ããã°
倧å€å¬ããæããŸãããæçš¿äœæã®å¥å©ã«å°œããŸãïŒïŒ
ãæ°è»œã«ã³ã¡ã³ããããããã¹ããð
ãããŠããå·®ãæ¯ããªããã°
ãã©ããŒïŒã·ã§ã¢ããé¡ããããã§ãð
ä»åŸãšãäœåãããããé¡ãããããŸãïŒ