Skip to main content
archive Search
Submit Donate Log in

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2602.20426 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 29 Apr 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Learning to Rewrite Tool Descriptions for Reliable LLM-Agent Tool Use

Authors:Ruocheng Guo, Kaiwen Dong, Xiang Gao, Kamalika Das
View a PDF of the paper titled Learning to Rewrite Tool Descriptions for Reliable LLM-Agent Tool Use, by Ruocheng Guo and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:While most efforts to improve LLM-based tool-using agents focus on the agent itself - through larger models, better prompting, or fine-tuning - agent performance increasingly plateaus due to the quality of the tool interfaces these agents consume. Tool descriptions are often written for human developers and tolerate ambiguity that agents cannot resolve, particularly as the number of candidate tools grows. Existing approaches to improving tool interfaces (1) require re-running a multi-stage per-tool pipeline - synthesizing queries, executing an agent to collect trajectories, annotating trajectories, and prompting a strong LLM multiple times - for every API that enters the catalog, and (2) typically optimize each tool independently, limiting scalability and generalization to unseen tools. We propose Trace-Free+, a curriculum learning framework that progressively transfers supervision from trace-rich settings to trace-free deployment, encouraging the model to internalize reusable patterns of what makes a tool description effective. To support this approach, we construct a large-scale dataset of high-quality tool interfaces derived from real-world APIs through a principled data synthesis workflow. Experiments on widely adopted benchmarks show that Trace-Free+ improves robustness as tool catalogs scale to 150+ candidates - in scaling experiments, reducing accuracy degradation by 29.23% and improving average query-level success by 60.89% on StableToolBench - generalizes across domains without retraining, and provides complementary gains on top of agent fine-tuning.
Comments: Preprint
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2602.20426 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2602.20426v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.20426
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kaiwen Dong [view email]
[v1] Mon, 23 Feb 2026 23:50:24 UTC (9,596 KB)
[v2] Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:08:36 UTC (7,995 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Learning to Rewrite Tool Descriptions for Reliable LLM-Agent Tool Use, by Ruocheng Guo and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Additional Features

  • Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-02
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • SciX
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation (opens in new tab) Simons Foundation International (opens in new tab) Schmidt Sciences (opens in new tab)